| | Next | Previous | Search | Home
| Table of Contents |
|
|
Treatment of Computer Software Computer software licensed for reproduction abroad will qualify as export property entitled to FSC benefits, ending a long-running dispute with the IRS. Gross receipts received or accrued on any such license, regardless of when issued, will be included in computing the portion of the FSC income that is exempt from federal income tax. This provision is consistent with efforts by the administration to improve the tax climate for the U.S. software and information technology industry. In November 1996, the IRS issued proposed regulations on the classification of income from software transactions, that were largely responsive to the needs of the U.S. software industry. At the same time, the Treasury Department issued a discussion paper on the tax issues of Global Electronic Commerce. Together with the administration's tax policy document A Framework for Global Electronic Commerce, it urges that the Internet and other forms of electronic commerce not be subjected to new or discriminatory forms of taxation. In addition, the administration has called on its trading partners to eliminate tariff and nontariff barriers on the import of information technology goods and services.
Changes to the Foreign Tax Credit Expansion of indirect foreign tax credit: The Act eases restrictions on U.S. corporations claiming the indirect foreign tax credit by extending the application of the credit to foreign income taxes incurred by certain fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-tier foreign subsidiaries if the following requirements are met:
No indirect credits will be allowed for foreign income taxes incurred in taxable years beginning after the effective date by non-CFCs below the third-tier or CFCs below the sixth tier, even if a subsequent liquidation, reorganization, or a similar planning transaction causes those corporations to meet the requirements of this provision.
Holding period: The Act denies a shareholder a credit for foreign withholding or other taxes paid with respect to dividends if the shareholder fails to hold common stock in the paying foreign subsidiary for a minimum period of 15 full days (45 full days for preferred stock) before or after the ex-dividend date and during which the shareholder is not protected from risk of loss. The shareholder is allowed to deduct any credit disallowed. Exceptions for securities dealers meeting certain conditions are provided. This provision is intended to curtail transactions designed to transfer foreign tax credits from persons unable to benefit from them to persons that can use the credits.
Translation of foreign income taxes paid or accrued: Taxpayers accruing liabilities for foreign income taxes for the year must currently translate them into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the last day of that year. When actually paid, those taxes are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate on the date of the payment, and the previously claimed foreign tax credit must be redetermined. The Act, however, requires that accrued foreign taxes (including adjustments thereto, such as refunds) must now be translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate for the accrual year unless the accrued taxes are (1) denominated in inflationary currency, (2) paid before the beginning of such year, or (3) paid more than two years after the close of such year. If one of these exceptions applies, such foreign taxes (including adjustments other than refunds) are translated using the exchange rate on the payment date. Refunds are translated at the exchange rate prevailing on the date such taxes were originally paid. Also, unless regulations provide otherwise, credits previously claimed must be redetermined if (1) accrued taxes when paid differ from the amounts claimed as credits for reasons other than changes in the exchange rate, (2) accrued taxes are not paid within two years after the close of the tax year to which they relate, or (3) any tax paid is refunded. In case an accrued tax is not paid within two years of accrual, this redetermination results in denying a credit for such tax.
No credit for certain sales of foreign subsidiaries: Under IRS rulings, if a foreign-owned U.S. corporation sells a foreign subsidiary to a related foreign corporation, the consideration received by the seller may be recharacterized as a foreign-source dividend and an indirect foreign tax credit may be claimed. The Act, however, denies this credit unless the earnings and profits of the foreign acquiring corporation (1) are attributable to the stock of a U.S. shareholder (either the U.S. seller or a related U.S. person), and (2) were accumulated during periods in which the acquirer was a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) and such U.S. shareholder owned its stock.
Simplify foreign tax credit limitation for individuals: The Act allows individuals with no more than $300 ($600 if married filing jointly) of creditable foreign taxes, and no foreign source income other than passive income, to elect to credit these taxes without regard to the foreign tax credit limitation rules. An electing individual meeting certain documentation requirements would report the foreign tax credit directly on Form 1040 and would no longer be required to file a Form 1116 with his or her individual income tax return.
The Act also makes the following additional changes affecting the foreign tax credit:
Controlled Foreign Corporation (Subpart F) Changes Elimination of PFIC/CFC overlap: U.S. shareholders of foreign corporations face several anti-deferral regimes that sometimes overlap. One overlap exists when the foreign corporation qualifies as a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) under the subpart F rules and also meets the definition of a passive foreign investment company (PFIC). When this occurs, a U.S. shareholder owning 10% or more of the CFC's stock is taxed currently on its share of certain income of the CFC under the subpart F rules and is also subject to an interest charge on certain distributions received from the CFC under the PFIC rules. Subject to certain restrictions, the Act eliminates this overlap by removing from the PFIC rules on a prospective basis income otherwise subject to the current income inclusion rules of subpart F. The PFIC rules continue to apply to shareholders owning less than 10% of a CFC that also qualifies as a PFIC. The PFIC rules also continue to apply to income earned outside of the overlap periods.
Exemption from U.S. property treatment for certain security industry assets: U.S. persons owning 10% or more of a CFC must include in income certain earnings of the CFC to the extent the CFC invests those earnings in particular types of U.S. property such as debt obligations of U.S. persons and stock of U.S. corporations. To help facilitate cross-border transactions by securities and commodity dealers, the Act exempts from the types of U.S. property triggering income inclusion: (1) deposits of collateral or margin on commercial terms in the ordinary course of the business made by a securities or commodities dealer that is a CFC or made with a U.S.-based securities or commodity dealer by a CFC; and (2) obligations of a U.S. person acquired in a repurchase transaction by a securities or commodities dealer that is a CFC. This change permits the above CFC to hold stock of U.S. corporations and debt obligations of U.S. persons as collateral or margin, or as part of a repurchase transaction, without causing its U.S. shareholders to pay tax on the CFC earnings equal to those investments.
One-year exemption from foreign personal holding company income status for certain active financing income of banking, financing, insurance, or similar businesses of CFC: U.S. persons owning 10% or more of a CFC must pay tax currently on certain passive income (subpart F income) earned by the CFC, even though the CFC does not currently distribute the income. Prior to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, subpart F income did not include income such as interest and dividends derived by a CFC from the active conduct of a banking, financing, or similar business, or derived from certain investments by a CFC in the active conduct of an insurance business. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 eliminated this exclusion causing such income to be included in subpart F income. The 1997 Act generally restores for one year the exclusion from subpart F treatment of such income, including financial services income as defined for foreign tax credit purposes. The exemption does not apply to investment income allocable to insuring related party risks or insuring risks outside the CFC's country of organization. This provision helps CFCs involved in these activities compete with foreign-owned companies whose shareholders do not face current taxation on this type of income.
With one exception the Act makes other changes that are beneficial to U.S. shareholders of foreign corporations:
Payments to Hybrid Entities Under Treaties The Act makes unavailable reduced treaty withholding tax rates on U.S. source passive income derived by a partnership (or other transparent entity) unless (1) the foreign partner's (or other owner's) pro rata share of that income is treated as income of the partner by the partner's treaty country of residence because that country regards the entity as a pass-through, (2) the treaty specifically addresses the availability of treaty benefits on items of income paid to a partnership, or (3) upon the distribution of such items of income the foreign partner is taxed on such income by the partner's treaty country of residence. For example, U.S. source interest received by a U.S. limited liability company (LLC) owned by Canadian investors will presumably be subject to a 30 percent U.S. withholding tax since Canada currently treats the LLC as a corporation and does not tax the Canadian investors as if they directly received their pro rata share of that interest and effectively exempts that income when distributed. Also, the Act grants Treasury regulatory authority to deny treaty benefits in addition to reduced withholding tax rates when payments are derived by an entity regarded as transparent for U.S. purposes but not transparent by the partner's treaty country of residence. Thus, Treasury would have the authority, for example, to deny by regulation a treaty exemption for business profits. Also, the Act may provide legislative support to regulations already issued on this subject.
Provisions Affecting International Joint Ventures U.S. persons that form international joint ventures are subject to a confusing set of income or excise tax rules when they transfer appreciated property to a foreign entity. A 35 percent excise tax is levied on gain realized on transfers of appreciated property by a U.S. person to: (1) a foreign partnership, trust, or estate, or (2) a less than 80 percent owned foreign corporation as paid-in surplus or as a contribution to capital. All other outbound transfers of appreciated property are subject to income tax rules. To eliminate some of this confusion, the Act repeals the 35 percent excise tax and a complicated penalty provision enacted last year for failure to report transfers subject to that tax. In their place the Act requires any U.S. person transferring appreciated property to a foreign estate or non-grantor trust to pay income tax currently on the built-in gain in that property. Second, it allows Treasury to determine by regulation whether income tax will be currently imposed on built-in gain realized when a U.S. person (or persons) transfers appreciated property to either a less-than-80-percent owned foreign corporation or to a foreign or U.S. partnership having one or more foreign partners. In the case of transfers to partnerships, the Act generally intends that no tax currently be imposed on such built-in gain if the gain, when realized on a later partnership sale of the property, is not allocated to any foreign partner so as to escape U.S. tax. Third, the Act amends existing law to treat as foreign rather than U.S. source income royalties deemed received when a U.S. person contributes an intangible to an 80 percent to 100 percent owned foreign corporation or otherwise transfers the intangible in a reorganization to a foreign corporation. This change will permit some companies to credit more foreign taxes by increasing the low-taxed foreign source income they are deemed to have received. Treasury also is granted authority to issue regulations applying this deemed royalty rule to U.S. persons that transfer intangibles to foreign partnerships.
The Act makes other changes to penalty and reporting provisions that relate to foreign entities and outbound transfers:
|
| Home
| Personal Finance Advisor | Growth Company Services |
Tax News & Views | Tax News & Views is produced by the Financial Counseling Specialists and the Legislative & Regulatory Services Group at Deloitte & Touche LLP. Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 Deloitte & Touche
LLP. All rights reserved. |