| | Home | Site Search | Tax News & Views | | |
![]() |
Making Taxes Simpler Clint's Window by Clint Stretch, Director Tax Legislative Affairs, Deloitte & Touche LLP Tuesday, May 13 , 1997 |
Clinton responds to calls for tax reform by proposing
simplification package
The package includes more than 60 legislative proposals designed to simplify the tax process for individuals, families, and businesses. Included in the package is a "Taxpayers Bill of Rights 3" to enhance taxpayers rights in dealings with the Internal Revenue Service. Some of the major items in the package are proposals to increase the standard deduction attributable to the unearned income of dependent filers; increase the de minimis threshold for payment of estimated taxes from $500 to $1,000; corporate alternative minimum tax reform for small businesses; reducing the number of taxpayers that face limitations on the use of foreign tax credits; and partnership simplification provisions. Two months before the President unveiled his simplification package, Republican congressional leaders sent him a letter urging him to send "to the Congress by May 1, 1997, a proposal to fundamentally reform our nations tax system." The correspondence, sent one week after the Internal Revenue Service acknowledged that its $4 billion attempt to construct a new computer system had failed, said the Presidents proposal should lead to a tax system that is fundamentally fairer, vastly simpler, and less intrusive into the daily lives of Americans. The letter was as significant because of who sent it as for what it said. The signers were House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga.; House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas; House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Archer, R-Texas; Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss.; Senate Majority Whip Don Nickles, R-Okla.; and Senate Finance Committee Chairman William Roth, R-Del.
When Treasury unveiled its simplification package, Chairman Archer was not impressed with the Presidents proposal or his revenue offset decision. "The Administrations proposal is not tax simplification," Archer said in a press release. "Its yet another tax hike on the American people. The tax code can and should be simplified, but we can do so without raising taxes ... Combined with a budget proposal that further complicates the tax code through the addition of 44 tax hikes, Im concerned that President Clinton again is solving our nations problems by raising taxes." Ironically, to make the tax code less complex costs money. The Treasury Department estimates the simplification will cost about $3 billion over the five year period 1997 to 2002. The President had two real choices on how to pay this cost: He could have refrained from providing a revenue offset, for which congressional critics would have labeled him fiscally irresponsible, or he could have proposed revenue-raising measures, also politically risky. The President decided to propose several revenue raisers, including modifying certain like-kind exchange rules, imposing a holding period requirement for certain foreign tax credits, and requiring new reporting and auditing provisions for large partnerships. Historically, Treasury rarely has been out in front leading the tax simplification parade, making this latest endeavor a rarity. More commonly, the Treasury Department will propose relatively innocuous de minimis exceptions to certain tax rules. This minimalist response should be expected given Treasurys traditional raison dêtre: to serve as financial agent for the United States government. The departments role has been one similar to that of the little Dutch boy who used his finger to plug a leak in the dike, except instead of water, the department has been holding back a flood of tax cuts. The Treasury Department, generally, and the Internal Revenue Service in particular have been under increasing pressure to improve the tax system; a difficult task given that Congress is the only group with the constitutional prerogative to add or take away requirements from the Internal Revenue Code. Beyond a response to members of Congress and the public, Treasurys simplification package is the outcome of a series of political decisions. For example, providing small businesses with alternative minimum tax relief was a political decision to cut taxes for those businesses. This is counter to Treasurys traditional view that presumes tax abuses potentially could be worse in the small business community given the huge number of such enterprises.
Many of the simplification proposals in the Presidents plan, such as increasing the standard deduction for dependents, are political winners and Congress probably will move at the appropriate time to pass them. Difficulties lie ahead for several of the other proposals. As Archer made clear, some proposals will not be enough for those members of Congress who want a complete overhaul of the current tax system, rather than just tinkering around the edges. Perhaps more problematic for the administration, the simplification package may have created an opening for critics of certain current tax laws to weigh in on their validity, thereby slowing down momentum for passage of many of Treasurys relatively non-controversial proposals. For example, by proposing a de minimis exception from the passive activity rules, Treasury has now given critics a forum for discussing the underlying rationale for having passive loss rules at all. The proposal to exempt from the alternative minimum tax corporations with gross receipts of less than $5 million inevitably leads some to ask, why not $10 million, or $15 million? Establishing a uniform reasonable cause exception for penalties will no doubt give some members of Congress a forum for blasting the IRS for what some of their constituents perceive as an abusive use of penalties. Whether the Treasury proposals are simplifications depends on who you are. The accelerated due date for partnerships, trusts, and estates is a good rule if you want to receive a Form K-1 that provides information regarding amounts reported on the fiduciary income tax return well in advance of the income tax filing deadline. If, however, you are a preparer of the partnership return, you may not consider the accelerated due date such a great simplification. This report organizes a list of the administrations simplification proposals into four broad groups: (1) protection from procedural and technical traps; (2) reducing the need to file returns, schedules, or report certain income; (3) administrative process; and (4) revenue raisers. Each of these is further divided into nine subgroups as categorized by Treasury. Taxpayer Bill of Rights 3 I. Protection From Procedural and Technical Traps Taxpayer Bill of Rights
Business Tax Simplification
Estate and Gift Tax Simplification
II. Reducing the Need to File Returns, Schedules, or Report Certain Income Taxpayer Bill of Rights 3
Individual Tax Simplification
Business Tax Simplification:
Foreign Tax Simplification:
Pass-Through Simplification:
Estate & Gift Tax Simplification:
Tax-Exempt Bond Simplification:
Excise Tax Simplification:
Other Simplification:
III. Administrative Process Taxpayer Bill of Rights:
Individual Tax Simplification:
Foreign Tax Simplification:
Estate & Gift Tax Simplification:
Tax-Exempt Bond Simplification:
Excise Tax Simplification:
Other Simplification:
IV. Revenue Raisers Individual Tax Simplification:
Business Tax Simplification:
Foreign Tax Simplification:
Pass-Through Simplification:
|
| Home | Personal Finance Advisor |
Tax News & Views | Growth Company Services | Tax News & Views is produced by the Financial
Counseling Specialists and |